For my article of definition I chose a piece out of the New York Times called "In Politics, "Let's Call a Lie a Lie... Finally." The main purpose is to inform how politicians are refraining from using the word lie and instead are using words like: misleading, deceit, and not candid. He sites how both parties are avoiding the dreaded L word and even shows how it has been replaced earlier than this campaign. It is and article of definition because it challenges the definition of a word against how others are using it. The author gives evidence to support his claim. He gets his point across. The author also shows what a lie can do to a candidate, despite them trying to avoid it. He also notes that they refrain even more from saying the L word in party nominee race.
For my op-ed piece I will be writing a little over the Economy. I will appeal to the TCU audience by putting it our Skiff. It will probably be titled "The only reason an economist should vote Obama.", but this could change. I think it will be a quick review of how economic systems work, and the obvious faults for each candidate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
That is a great article! The title already shows the bias of the writer in saying that his definition of a lie is the correct one. While the other candidates may be using other words to describe what may have gone on, it really is the author's opinion as to whether the things that are "misleading" are lies or not. Good job finding that one!
Politicians=Liars! no matter what if your a politician your a liar it comes with the teritory, and holds no limitations on the level of bureaucracy you serve.
That artile is just like the one I am writing for the Op-ed. it is a very interestng thing to think about, just how much the candidates lie and trick us to win our votes. It is really sad that this is what happens but it is a major problem these days.
Post a Comment